Testimony in Opposition to HB 862 – Expanding the Minimum Prison Term Structure

Date: February 5, 2025
To: Chairman Myers and Members, House Crime and Public Safety Committee
From: Mallory Rusch, Executive Director, Empower Missouri
Re: HB 862

As the largest and oldest anti-poverty advocacy organization in our state, Empower Missouri is committed to improving the quality of life for all Missouri residents through advocacy. Since our inception, Empower Missouri has focused on the criminal justice system and its impacts. Our Community Justice Coalition consists of community advocates and organizations from across the state who work with those who have been impacted by the criminal justice system. Many coalition members are formerly incarcerated or have currently incarcerated loved ones, and all are connected by a vision for a future without mass incarceration. 

We are providing testimony today regarding HB 862, sponsored by Representative Hovis. This bill would repeal the current minimum prison term structure and impose longer sentences for a larger group of individuals. With the current state of prison understaffing, coupled with research that shows increasing mandatory minimum sentences can have an adverse effect on public safety, we believe this bill would move Missouri in the wrong direction while bearing enormous costs on state residents. 

Current law stipulates certain percentages of prison terms must be served by people with one or more previous prison commitments. Additionally, anyone convicted of a dangerous felony must serve 85% of their sentence. HB 862 would amend the law, mandating that anyone with a previous felony conviction- rather than a previous prison commitment- be witholden to the minimum term structure. The bill stipulates that anyone with one or two previous felony convictions serve a minimum of 50% of their sentence, an increase from the current percentages set for one previous prison commitment (40%). It would also increase the percentage of time that must be served by those 70 and up (from 30% to 40%) prior to being eligible for release. 

Decades of research show that harsh sentences are not an effective crime deterrent, and a more effective deterrent is the certainty that you will be caught. However, in 2022, 64% of violent crimes reported to police in Missouri were not solved. There are clearly other avenues to pursue to address public safety concerns, rather than doubling down on increasing sentences when the Missouri Department of Corrections is already facing significant staffing shortages and other challenges. For example, SB 473, sponsored by Senator Schroer, proposes a reporting system for improving violent crime clearance rates wherein the Department of Public Safety would prioritize grant funding for jurisdictions with low clearance rates. When it comes to moving away from mandatory minimums, there is a roadmap for Missouri to learn from: over 30 states have reformed or repealed their mandatory minimum sentences in the past two decades while maintaining public safety. In 2017, Louisiana repealed many of its mandatory minimums. In the first six months alone, the state saved $12 million. The state’s prison population has dropped to a level not seen since the 1990s, and the state has reinvested savings into crime-reduction and victim support programs.
The changes proposed in HB 862 would carry an enormous fiscal note. In the 2024 legislative session, Representative Hovis offered an amendment onto HB 1777 that proposed the same changes set forth in this bill. That amendment received a fiscal note to the tune of $27 million in additional costs to the DOC over the next ten years. The DOC also estimated that this bill would likely add roughly .7 years (8.4 months) to the average time of first release for impacted individuals, translating to an estimated additional 2,774 additional people in prison by FY 2034 (if it was enacted in 2024).  In 2022, Missouri spent an average of $32,595 annually per individual incarcerated in state prisons. Increasing minimum sentences will increase both the prison population and corrections costs without making our state safer. Outside of Medicaid, prison costs are the second-fastest growing area of state budgets. Prisons cost most states almost five times more than they did in the mid-1980s due to having to house and feed people for much longer periods of time. HB 862 would also impede the ability of the parole board to effectively do their job in determining when an individual is ready for release. Now is the time to advance policies that reduce the prison population and take an evidence based approach to public safety, not move the needle backwards by passing additional sentencing enhancements.

Leave a Reply

Archives

Categories

en_USEnglish